Talk:Dus Bahane
Appearance
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Launchballer talk 06:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 2005 song "Dus Bahane" wasn't supposed to be shot, but the director Anubhav Sinha insisted Abhishek Bachchan and Zayed Khan?
- Reviewed:
Created by KunalAggarwal95 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 10:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
- @KunalAggarwal95: Not a review, but the hook is nonsensical, and the Times of India is yellow on WP:RSP.--Launchballer 16:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is not a deprecated source. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter that it isn't deprecated. It matters that its reliability has been questioned, and I'm looking for a strong rationale as to why it is being used.--Launchballer 22:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- as no other sources provide information. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 06:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'll let a reviewer adjudicate on it then. My gut says that it isn't strong enough for the claims it's making. You do still need a grammatically correct hook.--Launchballer 19:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- New hook: ALT1 ... that the 2005 Hindi-language song "Dus Bahane" wasn't supposed to be shot, but was shot in 10 hours and became the most played song of 2005?— Preceding unsigned comment added by KunalAggarwal95 (talk • contribs)
- Better, although MOS:CONTRACTIONS forbids words like 'wasn't', and I'd also trim it at 'shot' per WP:DYKTRIM, like so: ALT1a: ... that the 2005 Hindi-language song "Dus Bahane" was not supposed to be shot?. I note that the source says 'shot' as well, so AGF that this is acceptable in Indian English and call for another reviewer.--Launchballer 07:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- New hook: ALT1 ... that the 2005 Hindi-language song "Dus Bahane" wasn't supposed to be shot, but was shot in 10 hours and became the most played song of 2005?— Preceding unsigned comment added by KunalAggarwal95 (talk • contribs)
- I'll let a reviewer adjudicate on it then. My gut says that it isn't strong enough for the claims it's making. You do still need a grammatically correct hook.--Launchballer 19:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- as no other sources provide information. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 06:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter that it isn't deprecated. It matters that its reliability has been questioned, and I'm looking for a strong rationale as to why it is being used.--Launchballer 22:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is not a deprecated source. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: Was going to review this as this is the oldest fully unreviewed nom, however the first thing that hits me is the fact that there are two inline cleanup tags in the article, and these need to be remedied before this can go anywhere. Also, how long are you willing to wait for this? ALT2: ... that Dus Bahane was not supposed to be shot? would make an excellent April Fool's hook.--Launchballer 09:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator hasn't edited in over two weeks. If there is no movement on this in a week I'm closing this.--Launchballer 11:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Removed the tags. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 14:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I no longer need a QPQ, so let's see if anyone else wants this before I next need one.--Launchballer 06:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Long enough, new enough. QPQ unnecessary and technically copyvio-free, although if I was feeling mean I'd slap {{overquotation}} on the article. This does need a fairly robust copyedit, which I will do probably tomorrow. In addition, if my reading of the sources is correct, then I believe that Khan was referring to the song's corresponding dance number for the film and that the song itself was recorded anyway, which means that all hooks on this page are inaccurate.--Launchballer 12:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Would like to withdraw this nomination. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 05:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Long enough, new enough. QPQ unnecessary and technically copyvio-free, although if I was feeling mean I'd slap {{overquotation}} on the article. This does need a fairly robust copyedit, which I will do probably tomorrow. In addition, if my reading of the sources is correct, then I believe that Khan was referring to the song's corresponding dance number for the film and that the song itself was recorded anyway, which means that all hooks on this page are inaccurate.--Launchballer 12:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I no longer need a QPQ, so let's see if anyone else wants this before I next need one.--Launchballer 06:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Removed the tags. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 14:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator hasn't edited in over two weeks. If there is no movement on this in a week I'm closing this.--Launchballer 11:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)