Talk:Dursley

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Gloucestershire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The information on Cam should probably be put into a new article Cam, Gloucestershire. Our Phellap 21:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stinchcombe Hill

The entry on the Hill is a bit POV, ('a lovely asset to the town ...' meaning?, reference?), and travelogue-ish; and we already have an entry for Stinchcombe which refers to Stinchcombe Hill. This all needs some rationalisation, which I have attempted. Bob aka Linuxlad 18:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Introductory Paragraph

The introductory paragraph of the Dursley article looks like the scrapings off the cutting-room floor. Could the author please sort it out to the quality of the rest of the article. --Oldontarian (talk) 20:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dursley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080331065730/http://cotswoldedge.org.uk/dursley/Dursley_Donkey.htm to http://cotswoldedge.org.uk/dursley/Dursley_Donkey.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.southwestrda.org.uk/area-teams/gloucestershire/delkin-village/index.shtm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.southwestrda.org.uk/news/release.asp?releaseid=1458
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080331065730/http://cotswoldedge.org.uk/dursley/Dursley_Donkey.htm to http://cotswoldedge.org.uk/dursley/Dursley_Donkey.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dursley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051025074814/http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/john.wilkes/dursley.htm to http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/john.wilkes/dursley.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]