Talk:Durham, North Carolina/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 11:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
[edit]This article has failed its Good article nomination. As it has large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{Unreferenced}} or similar tags.
- There are 7 citation needed tags, better source needed tags, unreferenced tags.
- Along with these, a lot of portions are unsourced. Each of paras need citations.
- Copyvio report shows, a large portion is copied from other materials.
- Tables like 'No. of employees' are unnecessary.
- Section like 'Notable people' is just a list. Convert it to a prose.
- Too much detail in 'Transportation', whereas some portions like 'Economy' are very short.
The article needs serious attention for GA. Refer to other places GA and FA articles. Request for copyedit at WP:GOCE. When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 11:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)