Talk:Duo (Richard Marx and Matt Scannell album)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Page Move
[edit]I moved and revised the page to encompass both of the artists that created this disc. Before it was titled Duo (Richard Marx album), which left out Matt Scannell within the title of the page. --Candy156sweet (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Chronologies
[edit]I have added a seperate chronology for both Richard Marx and for Matt Scannell with Vertical Horizon, to show which albums came before and after this particular collaborated album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmyright (talk • contribs) 06:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- The chronology is void, because this is a seperate Duo or Group that has nothing to do with Richard Marx and Matt Scannell's individual projects. --Candy156sweet (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Look at the page of the album Robert Plant and Alison Krauss recorded. There is a chronology for both of them listed. The absence is making it seem like this CD has nothing to do with their respective chronolgy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmyright (talk • contribs) 06:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't mean that edit is correct. --Candy156sweet (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Look at the page of the album Robert Plant and Alison Krauss recorded. There is a chronology for both of them listed. The absence is making it seem like this CD has nothing to do with their respective chronolgy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmyright (talk • contribs) 06:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't mean it's incorrect either. I've asked for a ruling here. You and I will both abide by their ruling.Itsmyright (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will continue to stick to the rules of wikipedia, and you will too. --Candy156sweet (talk) 06:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't mean it's incorrect either. I've asked for a ruling here. You and I will both abide by their ruling.Itsmyright (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Third opinion on chronologies
[edit]I am responding to a request for a third opinion.
After checking the infobox format for the Plant/Krauss Raising Sand album and viewing this article history (version links: with and without chronologies), I agree that individual artist chronologies such as these are appropriate in this album article as well. — Athaenara ✉ 01:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for taking the time to remedy this problem. It's appreciated. --Candy156sweet (talk) 01:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Third opinion listing
[edit]Hello. I have de-listed this dispute from WP:3 because the article has been nominated for deletion on WP:AfD. As such, it would be inappropriate for us to be involved. If the article survives AfD and the dispute is still continuing, you may relist it at that time. Thank you! fr33kman t - c 00:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Why would this article be nominated for deletion? This is article on a legit CD recorded by Richard and Matt Scannell. Itsmyright (talk) 01:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Removal of AfD Tags
[edit]The nomination for deletion resulted in a keep status. The nomination tags have been removed from the page and the debate page is now archived. To view the debate page, click here. Thanks to those who participated in the discussion. --Candy156sweet (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)