This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
... But I am indisposed from being the editor who fixes it.
There are contexts where most words in titles should be up-cased “in depth” (as was improperly done for this talk page and its article, but even so, we should have, somewhere, clear enumeration of them. This talk page section would be an appropriate place for a very specific link to some (notional) policy page justifying a colleague’s decision to capitalize a common noun in a section title, and I think my nearly two decades of editing, and my contribs as the admin Jerzy for abt 1.5 decades should justify the reliance on my experience and associated intuition I rely on, in at least moving forward with rectification of what I take to be bad guesses, arising from experiences with non-wiki texts and not from WP guidelines, but reckless speculation,. --2601:199:C201:FD70:C11D:B304:E6F1:3439 (talk) 05:43, 23 August 2020 & 07:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe i am wrong in in believing Dunes (Stamps) is simply an ignorantly misnamed article, and i admit to being surprised to see that being linked here from Finbar Kenny. We in any case should at least redirect Dunes (stamps) and Dunes Stamps) to the accompanying page, and even if i am somehow wrong in saying it is implausible that a reasonable argument can be offered for Dunes (Stamps) --- without my having to refute someone's lame excuse for that existing article-title, at the very least, a blue link Dunes (stamps) should stand in the wings for the benefit of more sensible readers. --ex-Jerzy (ret'd admin), ex-JerzyA (lost-password non-admin), 2601:199:C201:FD70:143D:321B:6A89:80D8 (talk) 07:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
