Talk:Dune (board game)

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

128.186.40.99 17:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar edits

Leader should be in lower case, whereas Fremen and Guild are fine in upper case as they denote ethnic groups or organizations. 203.229.181.151 02:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Win Conditions

The article states that "the Bene Gesserit cannot predict the Atreides win condition." Shouldn't this say "the Bene Gesserit cannot predict the Fremen win condition"? Because no Artreides win condition is mentioned in the article. Zarkumo 12:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are mistaken. Atreides makes more sense since in the novels the Atreides have the "prescience." I also heard a reputable podcast that described the atreides as the faction which the bene gesserit cannot predict. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.98.99.155 (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I own the game, and I can confirm that it is the automatic Fremen and Guild win conditions (at the end of turn 15) that cannot be predicted by the Bene Gesserit. 192.12.184.2 (talk) 21:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History / History and expansions

The other day I changed the title of the "History" section to "History and Expansions". The reason is that at present the content of that section does not describe the history of the Dune board game, but rather simply lists the expansions that were published for it. There's insufficient content to split the section into two sections so I feel a rename is appropriate. My change was reverted for the reason "change section name back to "History" to discourage listcruft". I don't think the world is going to fall down over this but I don't understand the revert reason, given that there is a limited number of expansions, discussion of them is unarguably important to the article, and section names should accurately reflect their consensus. If User:Percy_Snoodle would like to explain I'd be interested in hearing. Or alternatively if no one is particularly excited over it after a week I'll come back and make the change again. Thanks. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem - happy to explain. It's my feeling, and the style guidelines at WP:BTG agree, that it's better to have a narrative overview of the game's history, including its expansions, than just a list of publication dates. At the moment the section is somewhere between the two; it could go either way as more information is added. By keeping the title of the section as "history", we encourage users to add information about the game's development rather than just adding bullet points. That's the hope, anyway - we'll see how well it works. Percy Snoodle (talk) 09:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That seems reasonable, assuming someone is keeping an eye on it (as you clearly are). I'll go on my way then! Thanks for taking the time to explain. - DustFormsWords (talk) 09:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BG default win

A buddy who is familiar with the game noted that he felt the BG win was not a simple projection of who would win, but who would win *on a specific turn*. The article characterizes this topic otherwise. Which is true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.165.40.55 (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The version I played required the Bene Gesserit to predict the specific turn the winner would win on. But it wasn't my game and I therefore don't have the rules here to cite. BoardGameGeek will probably have a downloadable copy of the rules, though. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dune (board game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140502215549/http://new.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_news.asp?eidn=2584 to http://new.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_news.asp?eidn=2584

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]