Talk:Duncanrig Secondary School
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
to Laridum it seems you need some authorisation to add a picture see the help pages good idea though Remcee (talk) 10:50, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
tagged article
[edit]hi, is there beginning to be enough references and citations in this article appreciate any help and/or opinion Remcee (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Title
[edit]the article is about the building designed by Basil Spence not about the eductional institution which now calls itself Duncanrig High School. He designed for Duncanrig Secondary School, hence that should be the title. If their is some agreement I will change the title back to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Remcee (talk • contribs) 11:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Tags
[edit]Much of this article is actually about issues more generally related to government policy and the procurement system for the construction of new schools, rather than to the school in question. It also contains a series of value judgements and personal observations that are inappropriate in the context. This is an encyclopaedia, not Private Eye. Moreover, it badly written in a conversational tone. Major clean-up required.86.1.196.156 (talk) 00:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Further to the deletion of all contentious material, I have added a small note on the new school building. Hopefully this can be expanded without drifting back to what it was. ColinCameron (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
It is not high school it is secondary school
[edit]The school is NOT called Duncarig High School it is called Duncarig Secondary School. Gr1873 (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
The school has never been named Duncanrig High School, so I am changing the title to reflect this. Any issues, please make them known here before changing back. ColinCameron (talk) 11:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Refrences
[edit]The reference list for this page needs some attention. Does anyone want to try to rationalise it? ColinCameron (talk) 11:26, 1 April 2011 (UTC)