Talk:Duncan Robinson

Duncan Robinson has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 23, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Duncan Robinson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Duncan Robinson's sixth-grade graduating class had only four students?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Duncan Robinson (basketball).

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Maine Low‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

College basketball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Basketball Association Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Duncan Robinson (basketball)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 18:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this review ASAP. Just before we begin, to sort out confusion, I will have a general review then an in depth prose and source review. In the general review, I'll use the "GA tools" box. Cheers! MrWooHoo (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyTheTiger: Overall, just a couple of prose conformity issues and then I'll pass.

General Review

First off, I'll look at the "GA tools" box. No problems except for it showing up with no images which isn't an issue for GA (at least not really).

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	See prose review below.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	You don't have any images in this article, but according to WP:GANOT that's ok. However, I like to prepare GA articles for future FA status, so if you can find one, I'd go for it.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	See above.
	7. Overall assessment.	~~See comments below.~~

Prose Review

Note: If you have changed the sentence that needed to be corrected, press Enter and start off the line with ::, then use Y or Done If the change was only partially done use Y, and N or Not done if the change could not occur. (If you would explain why, I would be greatly appreciated :P) To see code, go to edit source and copy the code.

"He was the 2014 Division III Rookie of the Year and a Division III All-American according to D3Hoops.com."

Remove D3Hoops.com as I think it's irrelevant.

DoneDone.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"In his early years, he just shot for hours, attempting to make 1600 shots per week."

He just shot for hours sounds kinda odd, maybe remove "just"?

DoneO.K.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

" Crotty had been a two-time All-American at Williams College,[8][9] having served as point guard for the 2003 NCAA Division III Tournament champions (and 2004 Tournament runners up)"

Unlink 2003 and 2004 Tournament as they aren't articles (yet).

Not done I am not sure this is necessary. I think we expect these articles in the future.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

E.g., while BigTen.org only requires a minimum of 1.0 made per game,[26] NCAA.org requires a minimum of 2.5 made per game."

Make the E lower case.

Not doneThis is normal sentence case, I believe, with the first letter of a sentence being capitalized.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Throughout the article, make the numbers into words. See WP MOS.

Done done.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, be sure to keep the "introductory comma" uniform throughout the article.

"On January 12 with leading scorer Caris LeVert sidelined, Michigan defeated (#3/#3)[31] Maryland 70–67 as Robinson contributed 17 points on 5–9 three-point shooting. On January 23, Michigan defeated Nebraska 81–68"

DoneFixed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyTheTiger: Passing now. Apologies for the delay. MrWooHoo (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source Review

No problems with sources, ie no dead links. Good job! MrWooHoo (talk) 18:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

This was made a good article in 2016. A lot has been added to the page since then, I’m not sure if it still qualifies.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Edklat (talk • contribs) 05:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]