Talk:Duke of Denver

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 March 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

(head spinning) But which one's the library ghost?70.52.28.219 (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red links to ficticious people

Do all these ficticious Dukes and Lords need to be linked? Do that have signficant fictional biographies? Jooler 10:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them do; but mostly this is an imitation of articles on RW peerages, like Earl of Devon; those redlinks probably will stay red for a long time too. Septentrionalis 18:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

On 3 December last, a certain TTN proposed this for deletion with the laconic fails GNG as justification, with no indication of what specifications it fails, or what should be fixed. This is not helpful. The notice is now aged, has been botted to category:Oldprod, and is not particularly useful. I have therefore removed it. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 01:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]