Talk:Duhamel scandal
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
source question
[edit]Is this source unreliable? I looked for something in English. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-01-27/-MeTooIncest-A-book-a-scandal-a-movement-XozPevsFAk/index.html --Delfield (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]This article, Duhamel scandal, duplicates much of Sciences Po § Duhamel scandal and Olivier Duhamel § Accusation of incest and child abuse. Three articles covering the topic is a but much. Either most of the material at Sciences Po and Olivier Duhamel should be moved here to Duhamel scandal (per WP:PROPORTION) or this article should be merged into the former two articles. Please discuss this at Talk:Sciences Po#Merge proposal. — AjaxSmack 00:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- @AjaxSmack: I removed here what is a copy paste of an old version of the Sciences Po article. Regarding moving the content to the Duhamel own page, to me, this is special and should stay as such, and it is too long to be on a person's own article, but I don't have a strong feeling about it. --Delfield (talk) 07:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please discuss it here. Thanks. — AjaxSmack 17:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
No further discussion on the previous consensus on the school's page, I kept the templates for the other proposed merge. --Delfield (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)