Talk:Duffy (Casualty)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 11:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Instead of using "DISPLAYTITLE", might I suggest using an italic dab? Done
With that in mind, the infobox and image's non-free use rationale looks good.
"break down" → "breakdown" Done
"wont they" → "won't they" (both uses) Done

Casting

This section looks good.

Development

Here and in other sections, each sentence with a quote needs a source per WP:QUOTE. Done
Won't tackle serial commas in this review per WP:ENGVAR.
"move the United States" → "move to the United States" Done
"take Peter into work" → "take Peter to work" Done
"Andrew was killed-off" → "Andrew was killed off" Done
Add a comma between "She explained 'Duffy'". Done
"return as traditional return" doesn't sound right. Done
Same issue with "locations spots". Done
"heart-attack" → "heart attack" Done
Add a comma after "Upon her return". Done
Remove the comma after "midwife". Done
"shared fifteen year" → "shared a fifteen-year" Done
"thirty year love story" → "thirty-year love story" Done
The phrase "stag do took place" doesn't sound right either. Done
In #Depression_and_dementia, add a comma after "as a result". Done

Reception

This section looks good.

References

Archive sources. Done
Daily Express isn't reliable per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Express. Hidden the two refs, so we have an opportunity to replace them.- JuneGloom07 Talk 01:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Metro.co.uk is also not a reliable source per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Metro.

@Some Dude From North Carolina:Metro have a good track record with UK soap operas. Duncan Lindsay often gets the exclusive information and interviews like Digital Spy. Will this article not be rated as GA because of using Metro?Rain the 1 19:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Raintheone: I see your reasoning; it seems to cover the article well, so I'll it slide. Passing the article.

Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you taking the time to review for us.Rain the 1 19:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mark references from The Daily Telegraph with "|url-access=registration". Done
Instead of writing out "(subscription required)", mark those references with "|url-access=subscription". Done
Finally, add a #Citations header for the "reflist" and a #Bibliography header for the books (example). Done

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·