Talk:Dục Đức

Dục Đức

Emperor Dục Đức, NOT Đức Đức. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.21.154.117 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 19 January 2006

Need birth name

Need his birth name. Badagnani (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Duc Duc → Dục Đức – As with many other Vietnamese articles, the matter of diacritics in the title needs to be discussed. The related article Tomb of Dục Đức was moved to the current version containing diacritics following this RM. The closer subsequently moved this article as well, but this was reverted without discussion. It's certainly worth getting community input; for what it's worth recent consensus at Vietnamese articles seems to favor using diacritics unless the subject is commonly known in English without them. Cúchullain ^t/c 19:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

• Support - as per RfC majority to treat Vietnamese like every other Latin alphabet language, also per use in academic English sources. In addition this restore is a good illustration of why simplifying by ASCII-izing Vietnamese names can be misleading. Even a reader with a very casual interest in Vietnam, should be allowed to see the difference Dục Đức to pronounce "Zup Duc" not "Duck-Duck," - what probably won't be apparent to the casual reader / beginner learner is the meaning of the two underlying Vietnamese-pronounced Chinese characters "Education Morality" (giáo dục, đạo đức). These names still hold meaning today and aren't random noise. They also help to distinguish when two Vietnamese people with the same name in ASCII are actually different names. (The ASCII version still exists as redirect). In ictu oculi (talk) 23:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

• Support Per results of Talk:Song Cong#Requested move which moved Tomb of Dục Đức to it's current location. Only makes sense that this article be moved to Dục Đức to be inline with that result.--Labattblueboy (talk) 01:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

• Support for reasons given above. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:40, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dục Đức. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303215537/http://vietnamdiscoveries.com/en/hue/place/architecture/tomb-of-duc-duc-128.html to http://vietnamdiscoveries.com/en/hue/place/architecture/tomb-of-duc-duc-128.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)