Talk:Dubrovnik Annals
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 January 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prod
[edit]I removed the prod. I inserted three independent sources regarding the journal. Moreover, the Annals are used as source in Wikipedia about 20 times. I think a description of the journal is needed to let the reader know WP's sources. Best regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 10:49, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Merge?
[edit]The AFD-discussion had 5 keep-votes, and 4 delete-votes (see here). Then I do understand the 'no consensus'-outcome. However, why it all of a sudden is merged is beyond my comprehension. Votes for that option were presented as a comment, or as a second choice, making it a minority vote at best. I do not mind being bold, but this should have discussed before doing so. I'll reinstate the article.Jeff5102 (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)