Talk:Dublin Wives

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

'The Wives' synopsis

The synopsis of the 'Wives' is laughably unencyclopedic; it is clearly just taken straight from the show's press release. Short of deleting it entirely I'm not sure how to edit it into a more appropriate section for Wikipedia (I've never seen an episode). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aerach (talk • contribs) 19:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it was laughable. I immediately thought it was a copyright violation. It sounded as if it was copied and pasted from the official website or something, but I couldn't find anything.
The whole thing is completely un-referenced, which as it refers to BLP could lead the whole thing to be deleted if it were controversial.
I've cut the fluff back to the bare encyclopedic facts. I've left the headlines such as "The Botox Queen", for the time-being. I've not seen the program either (it seems no one has!) so I didn't know how prominent these tags were to the program. I'll reflect again tomorrow on whether they are suitable for an encyclopedia.
With the exception of some of the Danielle stuff, there are no references. However there are some potentially controversial things; One is claimed to have been homeless; another pregnant at 16. I'm tempted to remove these pending a suitable reference being found. Anyone any thoughts?
--Rushton2010 (talk) 01:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I removed the headline things; they just don't work in an encyclopedia. I'm still concerned about some of the unreferenced information included however. --Rushton2010 (talk) 10:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dublin Wives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120531005758/http://www.rte.ie:80/ten/2012/0528/housewivesd.html to http://www.rte.ie/ten/2012/0528/housewivesd.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dublin Wives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130830162625/http://cbb5.channel5.com/c5/housemate/danielle/ to http://cbb5.channel5.com/c5/housemate/danielle/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]