Jump to content

Talk:Dušan Kerkez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Caps

[edit]

He only have four as he did not play the match Iran vs BIH. (official source) Matthew_hk tc 08:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clubs

[edit]

national-football-teams is not a bible, if it display 0 games it just means the site have no information. It is either the site does not have the data for all the season or for the individual player. national-football-teams may not tracked all the club in single season, e.g. if the player change the club in 2002-03 season, national-football-teams may still display he plays for his old club at 2002-03 season but with 0 games. Another extreme case the site add non-exist club to player career, thus is 0 games. 61.92.105.227 (talk) 14:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are saying nothing. He did play in those clubs. But, what´s the problem??? Find sources that say different, but there are no. Just shorter versions. FkpCascais (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know very well nft 0 (0) stats mean that they don´t have info (I already did a number of african players where all african teams are 0 (0) ). But, that is no reason for deliting all info. The Croatian wikipedia info is not beleveable because it´s unsourced (even, it does match some clubs) but it states that he was a team captain while having 20 years (very unlike...), and it sounds more like a propaganda pre signing comments, as it was written right prior to Rijeka signed him. FkpCascais (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Partizan stats are 0 (0) because he didn´t play in league. Jedinstvo Ub stats are 0 (0) because it was Second league and stats prior to 2000 are very hard to find. Stats 0 (0) for R.Obrenovac in his first season are probably for the same reasons. He may also have been loaned to another club that season (being so young at time...) but he was never captain of FK Vozdovac (I think cro wiki says...), that´s for sure. The Serbian clubs usually don´t appear (if they aren´t top clubs) in Croatian or Bosnian sources for the obvious reasons. There are many Serbian clubs missing in the Bosnian federation site in many players, I could even state they completely ignore them. The Jelenfudbal serbian site is just a joke. Really. FkpCascais (talk) 20:17, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The main thing here is that everything can be discussed, but arrogance I usually don´t tolerate... Removing info that is hard to get and makes me loose much time here, and SOURCED, deleting it as it is sh*t, I just don´t tolerate. But, I am open to all kind of discussion, whatever the matter or tone. Regards. FkpCascais (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How about Leotar Trebinje? 61.92.105.227 (talk) 08:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What about Leotar? I hope nothing is wrong with Leotar, and please, don´t delete it. FkpCascais (talk) 08:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
for sure his first season stats with Leotar has lost. 210.6.121.100 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:26, 13 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
I don´t mind so much about the stats, and it wasn´t me who edited anything about them lately. I just don´t want the clubs to be removed. He did play in those clubs and there are sources about it. About the stats, you can remove them if you wan´t. FkpCascais (talk) 05:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dušan Kerkez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]