Talk:Drug czar

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drug Policy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy articles

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

I would like to see references, especially first reference. Who came up with this term? Where did it first appear? I guess I will try to track it down if no one here knows. Kps2420 (talk) 23:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found a reliable source and have added info on the origin of the term. john factorial (talk) 21:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of those difficult-to-source (in Wikipedia terms, where you need a source about the meaning of the term, not just about the term) etymologies. I see news articles today are claiming it was coined by Joe Biden, but this is clearly wrong. Even the cited source (original claim by ONDCP) is wrong, as there are a smattering of appearances in Google News Archive and Google Books earlier than 1982. The etymology, for anyone caring to follow up, is an older use of the word "czar" for someone delegated in a government to oversee something broad that may subsume the activities of several offices. --Dhartung | Talk 06:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The term was first used in 1971 when the Jerome Jafee was appointed. here is a Salon.com reference [1] from 2000. There are at least two contemporaneous references in the New York Times:

"'You are going to be a czar, directing a national campaign against drug abuse,' Representative Paul G. Rogers told (Dr. Jerome H. Jaffe)-- Dana Adams Schmidt. "New Drug Abuse Chief Is Told He Doesn't Have Enough Power", New York Times, June 28, 1971.

"last August, in an interview in "Psychology Today," Dr. Jerome Jaffe, the Director of the White House drug abuse office from June 1971 to June 1973, said that 'nobody came home from Vietnam actively addicted' after he became the Federal drug czar" M. A. Farber, "Veterans Still Fight Vietnam Drug Habits", New York Times, June 2, 1974.

In the early 1980's, Joe Biden, among others, wanted Reagan to establish a separate cabinet level drug control office. Reagan vetoed the bill because he wanted to run drug control out of the Justice Dept, and the office wasn't established till Bush Sr. became president.

W E Hill (talk) 22:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Drug Czars

As an underground legend here in Seattle, I find it comforting to know that our Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske who allowed the wonderfully peaceful free Hempfest was selected to be the current Drug Czar. A list of former Drug Czars would be in order here. (An entry for Drug Czar should not be deleted.) -- SkewsMe.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.113.161.7 (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Former chief of police in Seattle Washington, Gil Kerlikowske, became well known for his response to 8 petitions opened on the White House's "We the People" petition feature. The petitions ranged from pleas for states rights regarding medical marijuana to one with over 75000 signatures that asked for complete legalization, regulation and taxation of marijuana. Gil declared that the United States has no plans to legalize cannabis at this time. The response to the We the People petition was posted to the White House website late in the afternoon on Friday October 28th, after the end of the news-week. The timing may have been planned specifically to avoid bad press resulting from the noise raised by the over 75000 who signed any one of the eight petitions responded to. These eight petitions (grouped together for the response) were among 10 that received responses in the same week, the first week that responses were given to petitioners. The response to the legalization of marijuana offered the least compromise to the signers of any of the petitions responded to.

I agree the page shouldn't be deleted. There is plenty of info out there that can be added to it. Because the early drug czars worked under different titles and headed offices other than the ONDCP, a redirect there might not be all that helpful or appropriate.

W E Hill (talk) 22:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drug czar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140808045811/http://www.fresnobee.com/2014/07/29/4045933/senators-urge-obama-to-deliver.html to http://www.fresnobee.com/2014/07/29/4045933/senators-urge-obama-to-deliver.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]