Talk:Drużno

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Drużno is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Venetic

It wouldnt be assumed to be Venetic as defined by Wikipedia, as that was Italic or close to it. The author probably means Wendish, as the Wends were referenced under the ancient name Venedi, which looks like Veneti. There are a group of similar names like this in widely scattered cultures and some oversynthesizers have wanted to connect them. There's no evidence beyond the name that they are connected. If they were it would have to have been in proto-IE times. But, that is a whole different topic.

Wendish was Slavic, so there is no need to repeat it. I commented that out for the time being.

Slavic is a pretty creditable theory. At that early date it is more likely to have been proto-Slavic or early Wendish. The first lake goes back to before Slavic. Polish is certainly out. But, maybe there is another creditable theory, such as early western Baltic. If I find one I will put it in.Dave 11:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Drużno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]