Jump to content

Talk:Drosophila silvestris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmhua. Peer reviewers: Hvmoolani, Rebeccaspell, OstapKukhar.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

[edit]

Hvmoolani (talk · contribs) 16 October 2019 Great work by the author who has set the foundation for this Wiki article. The research that you have performed and added is greatly appreciated. The sections you wrote on the mating behavior is quite strong and informative. The citations you use are also well supported and thoroughly distributed, which is very important. It is nice to have the images spread thorughout the article even if they are not of the fly. I have gone through and edited the article by rewording setences, adding hyperlinks for scientific terms that are not known by the common human, and added some sentences. One region that I have completely reworked was the introduction. It is important to include some physcial and geographical characteristics of the fly so that the reader immediately is able to place the fly in their mind. I have added this information.

Rebeccaspell (talk · contribs) 17 October 2019 Very nice job with this article! It is well-researched and has a very good lead section. The only edits I made were small grammatical changes. I added a few additional nouns to add clarity to some sentences where the subject was a little unclear. I also added a few hyperlinks to some of the descriptions (lava flow, “picture-winged”, eclosion, sexual maturity, endemic fauna). I don’t have any suggestions for major edits as this article was very well-done, but one thing that could be added is a few more relevant pictures towards the end to help break up the text a little bit more. Thanks for contributing!

Best article I read about a fly species so far. Well structured, clear, and concise. I don't think having empty section saying that there is no information on the topic is useful. Add them back if you see fit but I think it detracts from your otherwise very good article. Other than that, I made a few small edits here and there (refer to edit history for more details). The pictures are great and make the article a lot more visually apealling. Great work (OstapKukhar (talk) 04:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Drosophila silvestris/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 06:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Dunkleosteus77

[edit]
  • Right off the bat, there seems to be a lot of organizational problems, and there doesn't seem to be much logic in how you've divvied up the article. The Description section only has one subsection Morphology, but if it has only one subsection, then you don't need it to be a separate subsection.
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Could you clarify how this is contradictory? There are hundreds of new species of Hawaiian genus Drosophila, and Drosophila silvestris is simply one of the species. It is monotypic. Thanks! --Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for your comments! To better understand the reasoning behind this article's organization, I (and other editors of this page) were advised to organize the headings based on the logic of the suggested "WikiProject Diptera Article Formats" page, which many members of this WikiProject have been using to improve Dipteran articles. According to these guidelines, "Social Behavior" should be separate from "Mating" and "Home Range and Territoriality" and "Physiology" should be separate from "Description." I will take your comments into account and make relevant changes in the upcoming few weeks!--Mmhua (talk) 23:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They're guidelines as opposed to hard rules. You should do what's best for the article rather than broad generalizations. In a bigger article with a lot of information specific to those topics, then yes, split them. But on a smaller article such as this, it's best to group them all together under broader headings. Even the GA housefly doesn't follow such a system   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  04:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I should also warn you I haven't even started reading the article yet, those are just broad structural comments. I'm sure there's still some more information you could add, I need to check. Also, italicize the scientific name even in the titles of your sources, and I'd imagine it has a common name (such as Hawaiian fly or something like that)   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the italicization! From my research, there is no common name.--Mmhua (talk) 06:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. This species is not paraphyletic.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You say "may have arisen due to allopatric speciation from ancestral south and west populations" which means the southern population is a different species than the western population   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  03:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 00:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "...the fly often experiences reproductive isolation. Potentially due to these barriers, D. silvestris is able to breed with D. heteroneura to create hybrid flies" Doesn't reproductive isolation prevent different creatures from being able to breed with each other?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  03:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--Mmhua (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Despite Kohala being the oldest, the flies are found on the younger volcano of Hualalai. I changed the wording to make it more clear.--Mmhua (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]