Talk:Drosera arcturi

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Carnivorous plants: Plants Low‑importance

	Drosera arcturi is within the scope of WikiProject Carnivorous plants, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to carnivorous plants. For more information, visit the project page.Carnivorous plantsWikipedia:WikiProject Carnivorous plantsTemplate:WikiProject Carnivorous plantscarnivorous plant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Drosera arcturi is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Photo misidentified, not Drosera arcturi

The photo on the left, labelled "A flowering D. arcturi growing in a crack in sandstone in the upper Waimangaroa River valley in New Zealand" is of Drosera spatulata, not D. arcturi. I will remove it unless there is a good reason not to. MFdeS (talk) 12:05, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. I never looked at the image when it was placed there. Guess I should have paid more attention to it! I'll go ahead and remove it now. Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 12:51, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I have a few photos of D. arcturi I need to sort through, including the giant form. I'll try to find one that's up to scratch.MFdeS (talk) 11:08, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! We always need more photos of Drosera. I'm not sure if you're familiar with Wikimedia Commons, but if you want to upload your photos there, that'd be great. Then you can add them to the galleries of the different species pages linked from Commons:Drosera so that all the Wikipedia projects including other languages can use your photos. Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 13:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake! I assumed the photo ID was correct. That'll teach me! mgiganteus1 (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drosera arcturi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014144521/http://www.nzcps.co.nz/NZCPSDroseraarcturi.html to http://www.nzcps.co.nz/NZCPSDroseraarcturi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]