Talk:Drive Image (software)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move

The application DriveImage is actually spelled with a space between Drive and Image, but it appears the term Drive Image is currently redirected to Disk image, which shouldn't be capitalized as it isn't a title. The currently redirected Drive Image should be redirected to Drive image (lowercase), and DriveImage should be redirected to Drive Image since this is a product title. Rogitor (talk) 15:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support the proposed move on the merits and because "DriveImage" looks like "Drivelmage" (Drivel-mage). However, oppose the redirecting of Drive image top a different location than Drive Image per WP:NC(P) which recommends "adding a parethical (bracketed) disambiguator to the page name: for instance when both spellings are often or easily confused." In this case, only one letter capitalization separates the two. Either redirect Drive image to Drive Image (this article) or redirect both Drive image and Drive Image to Disk image and call this article Drive Image (software). — AjaxSmack 00:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support the move as requested by AjaxSmack. Moving DriveImage to Drive Image (software) is the better solution. Rogitor (talk) 20:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]