Talk:Drew Cam

Drew Cam has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 13, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Drew Cam appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that parts of The Drew Carey Show episode "Drew Cam" were broadcast simultaneously on the television and the Internet, a first for a primetime show?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Drew Cam.

Wikipedia

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drew Cam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131226155833/http://www.networkworld.com/news/1999/1123carey.html to http://www.networkworld.com/news/1999/1123carey.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Drew Cam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 14:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. Courcelles (talk) 14:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"finishing inside the Top 20" No caps in Top here. Done
"she reacts strangely." A bit ambiguous here. Done
You've got some overlinking of characters and actors, and we don't need to be reminded who plays Drew and Mr. Wick (and Oswald) for a third time in prose. Done
I think we have an article somewhere that explains "ratings share" that you could link to. Done
"The webcast attracted the largest online audience watching a streaming media event. " In internet history up to that point? Could be clarified. Done
" and she thought the audio was poor and out of sync." Earlier you said the webcast had no audio component? Can you clarify what is meant down here? Done
i"m confused, ref 11 says about the Victoria's Secret show, "which in February drew more than 1.5 million users to a fuzzy-pictured fashion show." If that's right, how did this episode out-perform that?

This one I had a bit of trouble with, possibly because the ratings source is a little confusing. I added that the webcast out performed the VS show by 500,000 visitors in the ratings section. Please let me know if that's right (or wrong!). - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 5 is dead. Done

Archive url added to ref. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's all from me. Placing on hold. Courcelles (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Courcelles: Thank you for the review. Sorry, that it's taken me so long to get things done. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think I see the problem. You're using a Press Release for the streams numbers, and of course, it has chosen to take the most favourable view of Drew Carey, and the least favourable view of the other two streams. "In three half-hour increments, the recent NetAid concert garnered an average 277,000 streams, while the recent Victoria's Secret lingerie model webcast picked up even less streams -- but Drew attracted a sexier 650,000 streams, beating both events " See the problem? They're quoting average streams for the other two shows, while quoting the entire number of streams for Drew. And the other two shows were more than half an hour long; they're just not comparing the same statistic. I'd throw this claim out if all that it cna be based on is a PR puff piece. Courcelles (talk) 03:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay. I've removed that claim. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Courcelles: Just realised that I didn't ping you! I think I've resolved everything. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Nicely done, promoted. Courcelles is travelling (talk) 21:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]