Talk:Drenthe

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Drenthe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Former countries: Holy Roman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by the Holy Roman Empire task force.

Municipalities

Despite the fact there are only 12 municipalities, the current table with municipalities is quite long. To get a better overview, I have tried to make the maps smaller, but I think the table looks best without the maps altogether. So I propose to remove the column with the individual maps and consider to put back the provincial map with all municipal names and borders on it, unless there is a better alternative. – Editør (talk) 12:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the maps from the table seems fine to me. With regard to the municipal map, there is one map already, would adding a basic version with just municipal boundaries add something? CRwikiCA talk 13:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not, I'm not sure. – Editør (talk) 14:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article for improvement

The goal of C-class for the article for improvement is reached, but the less developed sections (Demographics, Economy, Culture, Transportation, Media) could be expanded during the remainder of the month. – Editør (talk) 10:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I, unfortunately, haven't found much time to really work on the article. But great work! CRwikiCA talk 13:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And the month isn't over yet, so still a lot can be done. – Editør (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Drenthe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drenthe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140325223750/http://www.regiogroningenassen.nl/en/over-ons/ to http://www.regiogroningenassen.nl/en/over-ons/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Drenthe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sparsely Populated

By what standards are 191 persons per square kilometer sparsely populated? Creuzbourg (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch standard. It is the province with the lowest population density. South Holland: 1,410 persons per square kilometer. National average: 529 persons pr. square kilometer. Drenthe is rock bottom at 191 people per square kilometer. Check the table at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_of_the_Netherlands And yes, the three islands in the Caribbean are lower but they aren't provinces. 80.62.29.143 (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]