Talk:Draw (poker)

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as High-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Article rewrite

I boldly rewrote this article. original version. I removed 2nd person, some borderline-pov regarding how to play hands, added discussion of outs and computing probabilities for catching outs, dead outs, split discussion of inside/outside/double inside straight draws, and simplified the writing style to be more concise and easy to read. Big edit, so feedback welcome. --Toms2866 03:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It needed the rewrite. Nice job. —Doug Bell ^{talk•contrib} 09:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Backdoor draw table

I made this table comparing the probabilities of various backdoor draws to one-card draws. The point is to allow one-card and two-card draws to be easily compared in terms of outs. I was thinking of including it in the article but it seems a bit too much like OR. For what it's worth. Dcoetzee 00:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One-card	Two-card (43 unseen)	Two-card (31 unseen)
0.5	5.1	4.4
1	7	6
2	9.7	8.3
3	11.9	10
4	13.5	11.5

Jargon

This is so jargon ladened as to be almost unreadable to someone wanting to learn something on the subject. Could someone write this to be more approachable? --71.1.202.71 (talk) 16:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Draw (poker). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100113035825/http://www.wikihow.com:80/Play-Texas-Hold'em to http://www.wikihow.com/Play-Texas-Hold%27em

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]