Talk:Dragonfly/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 19:14, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks for taking this on. I'll address your comments at once. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Y
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Y
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Y
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Y
	2c. it contains no original research.	Y
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The "Distribution" section can be expanded. I'll give the nominator two weeks to expand that section. Otherwise, everything is good. Y
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	In the "In poetry and literature" section, I don't think there is a need to extensively quote these poems books, as I am sure they are three of many. Otherwise, everything is okay. Y
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Y
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Y
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Y
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Y
	7. Overall assessment.

I've reduced the poetry and the prose quotations a bit. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@Gug01: I've extended the Distribution section as requested. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I see. Nice work. Since it meets the GA criteria, I'll pass it.