Talk:Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film)

Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 5, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Producer?

Theres a differeing account on who produced the movie, Laemmle jr. (as said here) or Paul Kohner (as said in the article about Lupita Tovar). Both cite sources, that seem reliable. Any idea, how to solve this? 95.90.116.131 (talk) 10:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Universal Horror book credits PauL Kohner as the Associate producer. My best guess is that the article on Tovar is just using short hand to say Kohner is a producer as a job, but his official credit on the film appears to be just Associate producer. I have the blu-ray of this film and could check to confirm, but I feel like this covers the ground either way. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Villarias Dracula.jpg

Image:Villarias Dracula.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Error re Cast

Quote:

Geraldine Dvorak as Bride /Cornelia Thaw as Bride / Dorothy Tree as Bride

These are the actresses who played The Brides in the Tod Browning/Bela lugosi version filmed at the same time. The Spanish-language version definitely used different women, though I'm not sure that their names are known. In any event, these should be removed. WHPratt (talk) 18:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've more recently read some speculation that they could be the same women with different costuming and hairstying! WHPratt (talk) 12:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Music

I saw it last night at the Detroit Film Theater's 40th anniversary weekend. It lacks a score, except "Swan Lake" in the opening credits and a music cue with the opening of Dracula's coffin. If anybody has sourced information, please add it to the article, as I think it would be a POV issue for me to make note of it. MMetro (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I first got to see this version (on VHS), I preferred the rendition of 'Swan Lake' and appreciated the additional coffin cues. Alas, I'm now told that Universal added those for copyright reasons. Later BD releases are reverted. I still prefer Melford's version to Browning's, but these differences don't contribute anything to the argument! WHPratt (talk) 07:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drácula (1931 Spanish-language film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509224836/http://dvdreview.com/reviews/pages/3246.shtml to http://www.dvdreview.com/reviews/pages/3246.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The helper5667 (talk · contribs) 03:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks great, but i have a few suggestions

In the opening section can you put "In 2015, Dracula was selected for the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".

~~In the production section, i don't think Lupita Tovar CM629.jpg fits the section well. I'd suggest removing it.~~

Otherwise, looks pretty cohesiveThe helper5667 (talk) 03:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've added the quote. I feel like the picture of Lupita is good as it's her during the time of release of Dracula. I did something previously on my work I did for The Invisible Man (1933). It's a free image as well, so I don't think it hurts, especially as she was one of the longest surviving members of the cast.Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The helper5667:, I've changed the picture to one from the film that was in the commons. How is this? Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look great--The helper5667 (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

- Great, well done The helper5667 (talk) 11:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Character names in Spanish

I have a DVD copy of Spanish-language Dracula here, and that movie has near the beginning a title card listing the credits, including the Spanish-language character names. I think we ought to use those character names on this page, citing the movie. WP:PRIMARY would seem to allow it, and I have no particular reason to think the title card ingenuine; it looks like it's from the original publication of the film. The most important difference is that Dracula's name is spelled Drácula. (The movie is still spelled "Dracula", though, according to the title title card.) Thoughts, anyone? (I previously discussed this with @Andrzejbanas on my talk page, somewhat inconclusively.) Dingolover6969 (talk) 09:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dingo. Yeah, I think we should stick to what is on the screen per what you said. I can add a citation to a title credits per the home video if you like. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrzejbanas yeah, that would be great, thanks! Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Dingolover6969:, sorry for the delay. I've made changes per the films opening title card. This included updating certain accents (some name have accents, some do not) and other minor changes (Doctor over Dr.). The most glaring is that Dracula is credited to Carlos Villar opposed to Carlos Villarías. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks! For my part, I've updated the plot summary to use the spanish character names, and also included an image of the credits on the page. Dingolover6969 (talk) 23:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Good work on the character name bits. I don't think we need an image of the credits as the prose basically does the job with that, but otherwise good catches! Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough 👍. Thanks for your help and dialogue in all this :) Dingolover6969 (talk) 07:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]