Talk:Downtown Santa Ana

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

merger

I propose merging Downtown National Register District into this article, Downtown Santa Ana Historic Districts. This article name is the National Register of Historic Places' official name and it is more descriptive. There seem to be 3 or more local historic districts included in the NRHP nomination. The local name may well be "Downtown National Register District" but that is not a suitable article name. Only one article is needed to cover the NRHP listing and the possibly multiple local listings for overlapping districts, i think. --doncram (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

repsonse

You are correct in stating that the National Register of Historic Places lists Downtown Santa Ana into more than one district. I see only two districts listed in the National Register as it pertains to the Downtown. These are North which is described as Governmental and / or Institutional, and South which is the retail section. I understand that French Park is listed as a historic district there too, is French Park to be included or thought of as part of the Downtown also? The National Register describes the Downtown as being roughly bounded by Civic Center Dr., First, Ross, and Spurgeon Sts. French Park is north of Civic Center but if you want to think of French Park as being synonymous with the Downtown, I'm okay with that. That makes sense because of the many historic homes there.

Also, because of the roughly bounded tag, we may consider including the Chiarini building on 3rd and Olive streets as part of the Downtown.

I'll make changes to my article to remove any unnecessary info and then you may do a full merger. O. Ian Ávalos (talk) 10:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Howe-Waffle House 02.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Howe-Waffle House 02.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Howe-Waffle House 02.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

merger completed

Content from Downtown National Register District now merged into this article. Former talk page is at Talk:Downtown National Register District 14GTR (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive lists of non notable restaurants etc

I have removed the unreferenced lists of eating establishments none of them had their own articles so are not deemed notable by Wikipedia standards. Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Roughly bounded

The short description is indeed "roughly bounded", but the full description says "Boundaries are based upon remaining integrity as discussed in the text, and are shown on attached Legal Boundary Plan. The drawings leave nothing to the imagination. I'll make the necessary corrections. Generic1139 (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 15:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Downtown Santa Ana Historic Districts → Downtown Santa Ana – Article is about Downtown Santa Ana, the area, not just with respect to its historic districts. As per WP:COMMON, "Downtown Santa Ana" is a simpler way to title this content Keizers (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and WP:CONCISE. - Station1 (talk) 08:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.