Talk:Downtown Redmond station
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost performance
[edit]I realize that the cost of this segemnt has been controversial and tried to put in independently verified facts as neutrally and unadorned as as possible. Perhaps they belong in the East Link article instead of, or additionally to, here. - Brianhe (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- I would include it in the East Link article (which I plan to eventually get around to expanding, seeing as it is not likely to be merged after completion like the others), and directly cite Fremark's piece rather than The Urbanist (which treads the line of a SPS). It could be compared there with a similar analysis for the rest of East Link, if one can be found (likely, given all the controversy around the project). SounderBruce 20:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]Hello! I think an Infobox needs to be added. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Username Goes Here 062805 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- Stub-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- Stub-Class Stations articles
- WikiProject Stations articles
- Stub-Class Streetcars articles
- Unknown-importance Streetcars articles
- WikiProject Streetcars articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages