Talk:Doushantuo Formation

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Doushantuo Formation is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Age

I moved this here:"While its age has not been pinned down exactly, only one other lagerstätte in the world is known for certain to be older." The age range has been specified in the article. This sentence transmits no specific information. --Wetman 05:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes 2007-01

Added info from recent Nature paper. Need to read another couple references that may result in further additions SNP 00:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed

Could the author(s) please add a reference for the biomarker work on the Doushantuo Fm ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.7.248.130 (talk) 01:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sediments probably not marine

See this recent paper and associated news coverage. Bondegezou (talk) 12:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Doushantou Embryo Yinetal2007.jpg

The image File:Doushantou Embryo Yinetal2007.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New reasearch

This report at Nature.com, [1] should have a corresponding research paper, i believe. we need to add that. i notice this is sourced by science journals, which is why i have not added it. also unclear at this point how to summarize.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.135.151 (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doushantuo Formation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031202171346/http://www.palaeos.com:80/Proterozoic/Vendian/Doushantuo.htm to http://www.palaeos.com/Proterozoic/Vendian/Doushantuo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doushantuo Formation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608154420/http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/12/dead-fossils-tell-the-best-tales.html?ref=hp to http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/12/dead-fossils-tell-the-best-tales.html?ref=hp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.palaeos.com/Proterozoic/Vendian/Doushantuo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]