Talk:Doug Parmenter
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]Note
[edit]Noticed this name had gone unchecked on the Sterophonics page. Saw this guy on a Glasto (or possibly Carling Weekend) festival interview a few years ago, unsure how to add references? - Spoke to friends to confirm some facts. Feel free to correct, but assumed right.
He is not Welsh! His family are Welsh, but he has never lived there. He simply met Kelly when visiting family in Aberdare.
Cleanup message
[edit]Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner. Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 14:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Am referencing/cleaning up and trying to verify DUBIOUS facts {80.177.208.176 (talk) 03:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)}
I thort no article about this man would be compleate without a mention of the infomous Jazz World incident. Was one of the talking points of 2003s Glastonbury!--Talkshowbob (talk) 00:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
unencyclopedic
[edit]As no one has actually put any direct comments/complaints about unencyclopedic aspects of the article on here I have removed the tag for now. --Talkshowbob (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
To add to this im wondering about the tag on citations. Considering the length I would have thought that five citations was enough, especially as they are from well respected UK magazines and BBC television and again no one has made any direct comments on the this page. However I have not taken unilateral action on removing that tag. What dose everyone else think?--Talkshowbob (talk) 02:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Have removed tag for citations as general consensus is that there is no problem 80.247.91.15 (talk) 21:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
I see no problem with referencing/citations nor content however the article does need structuring/cleanup 86.141.85.46 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)