Talk:Doug Mastriano/Archives/2023/August
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Doug Mastriano. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Not a far right politician
If Wikipedia has a policy on keeping a neutral point of view, why is he labeled far-right? That is as biased as it gets. And why aren't some liberals labeled as far-left? 173.62.201.143 (talk) 00:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please actually read WP:NPOV. It starts
All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.
That's why. Reliable sources refer to Mastriano as "far right". They do not refer to liberals as "far left" because liberalism is not "far left". – Muboshgu (talk) 00:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)- Ah yes, the famously reliable sources that said that Russia stole the 2016 election, that white people are all racist, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Daryl Brooks isn't a far-left black nationalist. I see absolutely nothing wrong with unquestionably believing the lies of left-wing partisan hacks. 2600:4040:445D:C200:E125:82B9:5E0D:B414 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- It sounds like Wikipedia may not be for you. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 02:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ah yes, the famously reliable sources that said that Russia stole the 2016 election, that white people are all racist, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Daryl Brooks isn't a far-left black nationalist. I see absolutely nothing wrong with unquestionably believing the lies of left-wing partisan hacks. 2600:4040:445D:C200:E125:82B9:5E0D:B414 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)