Talk:Douchebag
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Douchebag page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days  |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Please do not request listing any people on this page. Such requests will be deleted on sight. Listing any person on this page without a very good reason and a reliable source would be considered vandalism, and if the person is still alive, would additionally violate our policy on biographies of living people. |
 | On 14 May 2012, Douchebag was suggested as a target on The Oatmeal, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
Requested move 15 April 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: withdrawn (non-admin closure). SSTflyer 08:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Douchebag → Douchebag (disambiguation) – The primary topic for "douchebag" is Douche, or its slang use, which is covered in the Douche article. Douchebag should redirect to Douche. Alternatively, this disambiguation page may be deleted per WP:TWODABS, with a hatnote pointing to Douchebag (film) at the Douchebag article. SSTflyer 14:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose as the current 3-item disambig seems to be more appropriate than a primarytopic grab. Dicklyon (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- The first two items both link to the Douche article. SSTflyer 15:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose no benefit to readers. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm pretty certain that the primary topic for douchebag is the slang term, and there is no data that the Nom has suggested that supports his claim that the PT is Douche. InsertCleverPhraseHere 02:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
For what reason is the article Douchebag full-protected instead of semi-protected? Angela Maureen (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- @September 1988: Have a look at the edit history, particularly the edits before the impositition of each prot. Or have a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive867#Appeal of RFPP decline for Douchebag. Or at the editnotice for this talk page. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- https://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla is the reason for all of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.39.175.199 (talk) 05:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
IPA useful?
[edit]It would be /ˈduːʃˌbæɡ/ --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)