Talk:Double superscript notation

This page should not be a REDIRECT, because it is neither a misspelling, nor a synonym. If people are taken to "double subscript notation" when they think they want "double superscript notation", they will be confused. Fresheneesz 09:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean - however, if we made it clear on the Double Subscript Notation page that Double Superscript Notation is actually called Double Subscript Notation, would that not clarify matters? Or have I misunderstood? Kel-nage 17:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would clarify things, but I think that it would put unnecessary clutter on the double subscript page. I mean, how many people really make that mistake (just my stupidty, and.. yours?). Fresheneesz 19:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, no, I found the page by clicking "Random article" plenty of times (it's how I do Wiki, I randomly search until I find pages that need improving). If it's so unlikely people will make the mistake, surely it can just be a redirect? Kel-nage 17:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]