Talk:Double Union/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Double Union. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
'Trans exclusionary radical feminist' is not NPOV
The dust hasn't settled on the removal of Valerie Aurora, but this article refers to her as a 'trans exclusionary radical feminist' - alluding to the 'TERF' term. I argue that this is neither factual - her removal was related to her views on **non-binary** inclusion, not trans inclusion - and is certainly not NPOV. Adding a npov tag to that section.
Quoting Aurora's post:
> This year, Double Union changed its membership criteria to “identifies as a woman or non-binary in a way that is significant to you.”
or non-binary is the highlighted addition; the previous language, 'identifies as a woman', which was already written and enforced as trans-inclusive, was not part of the controversy.
Tmcw (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Why is it called "Double Union"?
What does the name mean? It can't refer to the union of women and non-binary since originally it was just women. Equinox ◑ 07:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)