Jump to content

Talk:Double Falsehood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Authorship

[edit]

Shakespeare publisher "Arden" now claim it was co-written by WS. As this is a breaking story - and will be the default position of the publisher (regardless of their true motives), someone ought to update this article. I would, but then some 16 year old with no clue would remove my edits. Here's the Beeb's story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8569101.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.177.189.22 (talk) 23:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wilks and Booth

[edit]

Is there any connection between the Wilks and Booth who acted in this play, and the Booth family of actors and John Wilkes Booth? Ugajin (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The answer would seem to be No. John Wilkes Booth was named after John Wilkes the eighteenth-century political radical and reformer. Although that Wilkes was supposed to be a distant relative, the Booths only started to be a theatrical family with John's father Junius, so there is no reason to believe there is a Wilks connection from the theater. Junius Booth emigrated to America before Double Falsehood was produced, and although he did occasionally tour England subsequently, he does not seem to have been there in 1728. Nor is it likely he would have taken a role as relatively minor as Julio; he was a headliner. Both names were fairly common ones. Mandrakos (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no scholarly consensus that Shakespeare wrote any of it

[edit]

Some prominent academics have been pressing the claim that it's a rewrite of Shakespeare's play, but the debate has barely begun and I don't see any sign that the majority of scholars have signed off on this idea.128.252.173.23 (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the debate's been going on for nearly 300 years. Second, seek the signs that the scholars who have actually investigated this believe it part-shakespearen and you will find them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.226.95 (talk) 12:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. COGDEN 23:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Double Falshood → Double Falsehood — "Falshood" is an archaic spelling from a time when spelling was not fixed. We use modern spelling for other Shakespeare plays (e.g. we don't have Much Adoe About Nothing), so there's no reason not to use "Falsehood" here. Downstage right (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Double Falsehood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Double Falsehood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Double Falsehood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Double_Falsehood&oldid=1200420287"