Talk:Dotty Fothergill
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Dotty Fothergill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that when women's champion Dotty Fothergill (pictured) sued in 1970 for being denied the right to complete in men's tournaments, the Professional Bowlers Association countersued for "disastrous ridicule"? Source: this and this
- ALT1:...
Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC).
- Cbl62 Generally the article looks good. However, a couple of issues: Please can you add a source for her date of birth? I don't see it explicitly mentioned in any of the online sources. And there isn't a source for the 1969 BPAA All-Star championship win either- I've added a citation needed tag. Once these are fixed, please ping me and I'll do a complete review. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Joseph2302: Fixed. Cbl62 (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Full review:
- Article is long enough (4514 characters), new enough (created 2 February, nominated 9 February), and article is within policy. Article is well sourced now that above issues have been fixed. Copyvio tool picks up a 16.8% chance of copyright violation, but this is a false positive, as all of the "same content" are just names of organisations, or a couple of words the same
- Hook is short enough, interesting, in the article, and well cited
- QPQ done
- Image is freely licenced (public domain in the US, which is the image's country of origin), used in the article, and looks good at low resolution
- Overall, this nomination now passes. Congratulations, a really interesting article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Cwmhiraeth, Joseph2302: "the right to complete in men's tournaments" should be "the right to compete in men's tournaments".--Ipigott (talk) 10:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ipigott Agreed, though this looks to be correct when promoted (it's correct in Template:Did you know/Preparation area 2). Joseph2302 (talk) 11:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Joseph2302: That's because Cwmhiraeth got there just before you. Thanks for responding so quickly.--Ipigott (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Women's sport articles
- Low-importance Women's sport articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles