Talk:Dot-voting

As the creator of the Dotmocracy handbook and sheets, I hope I'm not considered too much in conflict of interest in writing this article. I truly invite third-party review and constructive edits. --Jasondiceman (talk) 07:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jasondiceman, I think it's great that somebody has created this article, so thanks for getting it up here and introducing the idea to people. However I would suggest that the article should be revised to first acknowledge the broader uses of the term as described in the second paragraph, rather than starting off with the more narrow definition of "dotmocracy" that opens the article now. I bet more people are using the term in association with general sticker voting techniques than they are with this very specific, though perhaps original, definition. Any thoughts or responses before I make that edit? COCoFacilitation (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's true that if you were to do a survey of facilitators and asked them what "dotmocracy" is, I'd guess in 2011 the majority would describe 'sticker dot voting' (maybe by 2014 that will change?). That said, looking at Google search results in 2011, "dot-voting" is probably about twice as popular as "dotmocracy" as a term for describing the sticker method. Maybe that second paragraph should be turned in a disambiguation box at the top of the page, pointing "dot-voting" to Cumulative voting? As well, maybe this page should be renamed to "Dotmocracy sheets" thus making it more specific. Thoughts? Jason Diceman (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dotmocracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article content is identical to an external site's page

I've found https://dotmocracy.org/what_is/ which seems identical to this article - all the same words, headings, and links. That page and this article don't mention each other. Not sure which came first!

I'm not sure what's best to do about this. Neil Vass (talk) 11:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]