Jump to content

Talk:Dostana (2008 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The Summary of the film on this page is really badly written, but I haven't seen the film so I can't correct it. Can anyone else?

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dostana (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dostana (2008 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kailash29792 (talk · contribs) 06:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will review the article today, add comments tomorrow. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lede
Plot

Flawless (at least in my perspective). I think the actor names can be removed from this section to avoid exceeding the 700-word limit, and avoid violating WP:OVERLINK. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

Complies with WP:FILMCAST. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Production
Soundtrack
Notes
  • The note "Also for her role in Fashion" appears twice. Perhaps you could write {{efn|name=Fashion|Also for her role in Fashion}} for one of the statements, then {{efn|name=Fashion}} for the other? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Release
Final comments

I've done a thorough read of the article, and feel it is very much GA-worthy (in fact, even beyond). While I will pass this with no further questions, I feel this book can be used to further expand the article for a potential FAC. But congratulations anyway Krish! --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]