Talk:Doreen Knatchbull, Baroness Brabourne

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge

There is noting of note here that could not be contained within the Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma article. Anyone agree/disagree?--Vintagekits 16:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could definitely do with merging somewhere. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 23:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In step, I see. --Counter-revolutionary 00:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In step like the AfD you quoted the other week! good one!--Vintagekits 00:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These editors consistently vote together on the same issues and show severe anti-British views. I believe this nomination is in bad faith. Their edit histories show this.--Counter-revolutionary 00:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its not even nominated yet! lol! --Vintagekits 00:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I see it was? --Counter-revolutionary 00:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In your last post - "I believe this nomination is in bad faith." If I was showing "severe anti-British views" as you say then I would be looking to delete this article - I am not it should be a merge and redirect for the fact that it adds nothing other than it contained already within Dandruffs article.--Vintagekits 09:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, shut up, you know perfectly well what I meant. This article would easily pass WP notability, especially if, instead of deleting articles, you researched them! --Counter-revolutionary 09:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been remind on countless occasions about WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. I am getting pretty tired of your attacks to be honest. Please keep a civil tone and dont tell other edits to "shut up". As the article stands it adds nothing. I am going to AfD it.--Vintagekits 09:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and I'm growing quite tired of you also. Do what you like. --Counter-revolutionary 11:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I challenge you to provide just one cast-iron example of me showing "severe anti-British views", otherwise I respectfully suggest you retract your comment and refrain from making it in future. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 12:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge part 2

Merge with Michael Knatchbull, 5th Baron Brabourne. That article already contains 95% of the information in this one, and the remaining 5% can easily be added. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 12:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.--Vintagekits 17:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. - Kittybrewster (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If this article can be expanded with verifiable information then it should remain unmerged. Although I'm no expert, I would guess that it could be expended. Greenshed 22:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of her death

I see that thepeerage.com is given as a source, and that her date of death is given there as 27 August 1979.[1] There's no doubt that that's an error. It's universally accepted that the explosion which killed Lord Mountbatten was on 27 August, and several sources say that the dowager Lady Brabourne died the next day. See BBC News, Time Magazine, The Telegraph, and p. 4 of her grandson's book. Based on all of that, I've gone ahead and changed the date. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doreen Knatchbull, Baroness Brabourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170430232921/http://mountbattenofburma.com/ to http://mountbattenofburma.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]