Talk:Dorchester, South Carolina
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in South Carolina may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dorchester, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060514055609/http://www.charleston.net:80/stories/?newsID=16420§ion=localnews to http://www.charleston.net/stories/?newsID=16420§ion=localnews
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.rootsweb.com/~galiber3/hall2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Dorchester, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907132301/http://www.pbministries.org/History/John%20T.%20Christian/vol2/history2_part1_06.htm to http://www.pbministries.org/History/John%20T.%20Christian/vol2/history2_part1_06.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.charleston.net/stories/?newsID=16420§ion=localnews
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050816040055/http://www.bwlord.com/Lord/joseph_lord.htm to http://www.bwlord.com/Lord/joseph_lord.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070622124904/http://www.bwlord.com/Ipswich/ImmigrationtoSouthCarolina/Dorchester/LettersofJosephLord.htm to http://www.bwlord.com/Ipswich/ImmigrationtoSouthCarolina/Dorchester/LettersofJosephLord.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Not really a ghost town by definition any more.
[edit]The former site of the historic ghost town of Dorchester centered around the old white meeting house church has been completely engulfed by Occupied residential developments and encroachments. it is no longer technically a ghost town as not much of the actual colonial town is left save the church and the graveyard site. It's literally surrounded by lived-in developments on all sides which sit on all other parts of the former town. Therefore the land ascribed to the ghost town has many current living residents. Further more the church and graveyard site itself has been declared a historic site, and is now Maintained and serves as a small park allowing visitors. because the entire site is maintained by or occupied by living people it no longer can be classified as a ghost town.
- Start-Class Ghost town articles
- Low-importance Ghost town articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class South Carolina articles
- Unknown-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in South Carolina