Talk:Doppler Labs

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because although the company is soon to be defunct it's still a notable company and has received media coverage as seen in references. The article needs some more work, but it should be kept.--Melodies1917 (talk) 16:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should NOT be deleted, as company clearly meets WP:Notability. Articles about the company's closure appeared this past week in Forbes, TechCrunch, Gizmodo, Wired, The Verge, Business Insider and Engadget, so I think the company clearly meets the requirement for third-party sources, despite its closure--and despite whoever wrote the original, terrible article. --FeldBum (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]