Talk:Doosan Group

ʝ== Put the links and infobox back ==

I think it would be good for the main page to have the infobox with the Korean name and some external links, maybe we can put them back? Kappa 09:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image doesn't show

Thank you for your advice. But I think there is a little problem about image of Doosan(CI). I'll check and fix it up as soon as possible. Truism77 09:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)truism77[reply]

External links

I think this article has too many external links for its size. Besides not having explained the constituency of the Group and then linking to each constituent, it is bad form to have more space taken up by external links than actual material. jnothman ^talk 10:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted some links of Doosan subsidiaries. There remain Doosan Group web site and 2 major subsidiaries. Truism77 01:13, 6 January 2006 (UTC)truism77[reply]

Wanna add information

And the group runs consumers' business such as publication, food, household articles, magazine and fashion and it also owns advertising company as a subsidiary.

History

1896~1946 Doosan started its history in 1896 as a small store in Baeogae, Seoul. The founder of Doosan is Park Seung-jik. His successor, Park Doo-byung expanded the tiny store into the Doosan Store in 1946.

1950~1969 Doosan established Oriental Brewery in 1952. Throughout the 1960s, the group set up Doosan construction&Engineering, Doosan Food&Beverage abd Doosan Machinery.

1970~1979 After the oil shocks, the group sold out weak business to strengthen its business power.

1980~1995 Doosan started publishing and advertising business.

1996~ The group took an intensive business restructuring and enhanced its financial structure and business power.

2001~2005 Doosan took over Doosan Heavy Industrial&Construction in 2001 and Doosn Infracore in 2005. Doosan Heavy Industrial&Construction produces power plant facilities, desalination plants. Doosn Infracore produces excavators, lift trucks, machine tools, and engines.

Sources from http://www.doosan.com/english/main/english.pdf.

<Question> In the end of the original source, there is a note "Reusing text of 2005 Doosan Annual Report permitted under GFDL." I get sources from it and write the same material with different words. Is it a copyright violation or not? Please review http://www.doosan.com/english/main/english.pdf. Truism77 07:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)truism77[reply]

If we are just using the facts and not the actual words, we are fine. Kappa 06:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm XXXX's offspring

Hi, I'm one of your employees daughters named XXXXXXX XXXXXX. XXXX XXXXXX is one of the most hard working people i know. He works at the Doosan in Swannee, Georgia. He works hard everyday from 7-5 and doesn't even complain about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.30.50.98 (talk) 02:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed names of living individuals from the paragraph above. I justify this removal because it was original research and was an unsourced comment about a living individual, and was not allowed under Wikipedia policy for these reasons. However, my real reason for bothering to remove it is that I do not think it is appropriate to use the talk pages as a bulletin board for employee commendations, especially ones from the employee's family.71.109.144.58 (talk) 22:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flak tag?

The entry currently reads like Doosan PR script. Has anyone made a flak tag, I'd like to add it. Trachys (talk) 09:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is "network of over 1,400 dealer network" redundant

I think "network of over 1,400 dealer network" is redundant and that the word "network" only needs to appear once in the sentence. It previously said "network of over 1,400 dealers". Why was this changed? It does not seem to be an improvement.

Please disregard the duplication of this section. I must have clicked twice. Feel free to delete one of the other71.109.144.58 (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is "network of over 1,400 dealer network" redundant

I think "network of over 1,400 dealer network" is redundant and that the word "network" only needs to appear once in the sentence. It previously said "network of over 1,400 dealers". Why was this changed? It does not seem to be an improvement. 71.109.144.58 (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC) Please disregard the duplication of this section. I must have clicked twice. Feel free to delete one of the other71.109.144.58 (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]