Talk:Dongkha La

India: Sikkim Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sikkim (assessed as Low-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elevation

I've not been able to find an authoritative source for elevation. Sir J. D. Hooker's journal gives three elevations measured by barometric pressure at 18,589, 18,387 (page 637) and 18,466 feet and boiling pressure gave 17,866 (page 619).

From other literature, 18,466 has been cited, so I've used an approximation of 18,000 to show that elevation should be checked.

The original 12,000ft/3060m has probably come from this source:

At 3,059 m mountain sickness sets in,...

But said source does not give other numbers for elevation.

Then Sikkim: Past and Present gives 18,100 feet. Cheers, --Rayshade (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Classification

Confirm as stub class, low importance. --Rayshade (talk) 21:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh

It has been discovered that this book:

Gupta, Om. Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Gyan Publishing House, 2006. ISBN 8182053897, 9788182053892.

Contains significant amounts of material plagiarized from Wikipedia articles. (Some other books from the same publisher also have this problem). There is no practical way of determining which material came from Wikipedia, and which came from other sources. Further, widespread plagiarism is an indication of poor scholarship. For those reasons, and according to Wikipedia policy, WP:CIRCULAR, I will deleting all citations to the book. However I will not delete the material that cites it, as there's no indication that the material is inaccurate. For more background, see WP:RSN#Circular references: Gyan Publishing and ISHA Books, or the archive after it goes there. Will Beback talk 22:34, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two different passes

According to this Chinese map, there are two different passes with similar names that are very close to each other:

冻嘎拉山口 - Chinese side
东格亚拉 - India side

Maybe there is some lost in translation stuff here, since both are translating from Tibetan. --Voidvector (talk) 05:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also this path is not on this map. The nearest path on that map is Khongjakma" or "khungyami La". --Voidvector (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dongkha La. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040223013559/http://www.sikkiminfo.net/mountain_passes.htm to http://www.sikkiminfo.net/mountain_passes.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]