Talk:Donald Vroon
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Various Tags
[edit]I noticed that this article has been tagged for quite some time. Here are the problems with this article:
- The article's subject is of debatable notability. There are numerous Classical music critics - including those who are objectively more notable and who are published in major periodicals - who do not have a Wikipedia article.
- The sourcing for this article is limited in the extreme. Existing sources point to the subject's own publication (American Record Guide), a web newsgroup, and wikiquote. This kind of sourcing would not pass muster in any reviewed article.
The article has been tagged for more than a year, and finding adequate sourcing may be something of a challenge. I am inclined to list this for deletion. I welcome other opinions before noting it as such.
72.185.104.55 (talk) 00:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)I would argue not to delete. He owns and is chief editor of a long standing magazine.