Talk:Donald Berwick

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

The whole paragraph on IHI appears to be lifted directly from their website (ihi.org) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.159.91.45 (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This biography has to comply with WP:NPOV. I want to know what the critics say about him, even if they're wrong. If there are hearings and Berwick gets attacked, I want to know in advance what the attacks are going to be so I can prepare for them.

I'm well aware that the WSJ article quoted in the Weekly Standard got NICE completely wrong. You can attribute it more accurately, but you can't just delete it. You can also add a better explanation of Berwick's ideas on the subject (and it's probably best that you do it here in Talk first).

It's not as if his enemies don't read the Weekly Standard and the WSJ editorial page and if you keep it out of Wikipedia nobody will know about it.

You can also edit the NICE entry. --Nbauman (talk) 01:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a perfect communist to me . I'm sure he'll fit right in with the rest at the White house. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.183.209.90 (talk) 13:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who are "they"? "They" do seem to talk alot! I question this article's bias since "they" are not identified as the ones Berwick is vetted to avoid: the Democrats who would also have questioned him during the vetting process! He should "fit right in" with this Administration! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.149.158.158 (talk) 17:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"They" are Berwick's conservative critics, which the paragraph begins with. They are identified in the citations at the end of the paragraph. --Nbauman (talk) 12:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The term "marxist" is used to describe a statement that has little to do with Marxism. Not everyone who seeks to redistribute goods is a marxist. This adjective should be removed. [----murfmensch}

Out of context quote

There is a quote from Donald Berwick in the article "The decision is not whether or not we will ration care - the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open.”

This quote is taken out of context. The source document from which the quote was taken was a lengthy discussion about how the government could integrate new drugs and/or medical treatments into government health insurance programs without bankrupting the existing system. Berwick is essentially arguing for a cost/benefit analysis to be applied to incremental increases in treatments. The quote is applied in such a manner as to suggest that Berwick is advocating the rationing of existing health care treatment plans, which is NOT what he is advocating.

Why isn't this included in Dr Berwick's quotes? Is someone on WP running interference for him and, by extension, the socialist healthcare system he wants to bring to the US? “I am romantic about the NHS; I love it. All I need to do to rediscover the romance is to look at health care in my own country.” www.donberwick.com50.10.99.70 (talk) 20:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The immediate context of the quote makes it clear that he is making a broader point from the example of new drugs and treatments. The sentence before the quote reads "We make these decisions all the time" The sentence after the quote reads "And right now we are doing it blindly"

Both suggest that he is referring to current practice, not some kind of specialist and distinct future.

Jpmaytum (talk) 11:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Full Quote

For the benefit of others, this is the full quote (from an article about Comparative Effectiveness Research)

Q:Critics of CER have said that it will lead to the rationing of healthcare.

A: We can make a sensible social decision and say, "Well, at this point, to have access to a particular additional benefit [new drug or medical intervention] is so expensive that our taxpayers have better use for those funds." We make those decisions all the time. The decision is not whether or not we will ration care - the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open. And right now, we are doing it blindly. Jpmaytum (talk) 12:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC) Jpmaytum (talk) 12:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JAMA viewpoint

Here's an article by Berwick in which he describes his experiences with the political attacks.

http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1769898 Viewpoint | November 13, 2013 The Toxic Politics of Health Care Donald M. Berwick JAMA. 2013;310(18):1921-1922. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281965. --Nbauman (talk) 23:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Donald Berwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140514041458/http://www.berwickforgovernor.com/issue-statement/jobs-economy to http://www.berwickforgovernor.com/issue-statement/jobs-economy

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Donald Berwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Donald Berwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110517220506/http://healthaffairs.org/blog/author/berwickjainporter/ to http://healthaffairs.org/blog/author/berwickjainporter/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2010/03/who-is-don-berwick-and-what-will-he-mean-for-reform-.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.redstate.com/ben_domenech/2010/05/12/obama-nominee-donald-berwick%E2%80%99s-radical-agenda/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2010/07/in-a-surprise-move-administration-appoints-berwick-to-head-cms.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]