Jump to content

Talk:Donald B. Smith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Donald B. Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Donald B. Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unilateral citation-whining

[edit]

There is no possibility of there being any "source" for the prior assertion that Robert Thoubboron (spelled THAT way and not "Thoubborn") had the Democratic nomination in the 2001 general election. Why is one suddenly demanded when I correct it to the actual case of his being down to one independent ballot line, dubbed "SAFE" at the Board of Elections official results pages I cite in my comments? As a member of the Putnam County Democratic Committee since 1987 I can assure you that in 2001 we nominated Smith and he wasn't primaried. Thoubboron had the Democratic nomination in 1985 when he beat the Republican interim sheriff George Grenier. In 1989 he won with Republican cross-endorsement and in 1993 (having switched his registration) he won as a Republican with Democratic cross-endorsement. By 1997 Thoubboron had raised enough hackles that we nominated Peter Convery, a Putnam resident holding a high position in the Westchester Sheriff's department, to run against him, but he won and named Convery undersheriff (replacing the former undersheriff he had alienated) on condition of switching to Republican as well. (Convery remained undersheriff until his sudden death about a year ago). In his fourth term Thoubboron continued to make more enemies. In 2001 there was no way we were going to nominate Thoubboron, and we even went to the point of nominating Republican Deputy County Executive Donald B. Smith to run against him (as all major parties with guaranteed ballot lines wound up doing). Ever since then we have not nominated Smith and this year we finally won with Langley after the Levy/Hossu lawsuit debacle caused a collapse in Smith's support in the Republican organization.

Fourthords seem to feel, on no evidence, that the erroneous listing of Thoubboron as Democratic candidate in 2001 must be protected because that unsourced and unsourceable claim has been corrected without a citation, and rather than go to the putnamboe.com website where it can be found under election results, as noted in my prior comments, so as to improve the article by adding the citation (or going to the putnamsheriff.com site where the bio page goes through a great deal of Smith's military career that other busybodies have previously deleted from this article to add citations there) UNimproves the article by restoring the errors.

As for the "source" for Smith's touting his retired brigadier general status on department stationery, the "source" for that is every document issued on department letterhead for the last fifteen years. Thoubboron's son was a school classmate, I have known Smith for years, I have campaigned for every Democratic nominee for decades and know the election commissioners. If other editors have credentials on this issue let's hear them.LE (talk) 19:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In your edits here (and subsequently here and here), you introduced five new claims without citing any reliable sources. Per the English Wikipedia's policy of verifiability: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." That same policy says, "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." Our policy on biographies of living persons says, "Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research." Therefore, I will remove any claims in the body of the article lacking citations to reliable sources, and any summary information in the lead derived therefrom. I'm happy to discuss this here, but as far as I can ascertain, Mr. Smith is still alive and out policies are quite clear regarding such. — fourthords | =Λ= | 22:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As noted you demand source citations from me but not from whoever it was that said Thoubboron was the Democratic candidate in 2001. And I have repeatedly directed you to the election results section at putnamboe.com for verification that he was not. You have simply reverted both the correction of the erroneous party identification and the correction of the spelling. There was never any sourcing for the errors. O fail to see how you are paying the greatest care and attention to neutrality.LE (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As noted you demand source citations from me […] The policies demand reliably-sourced citations from everybody.

[…] but not from whoever it was that said Thoubboron was the Democratic candidate in 2001. And I have repeatedly directed you to the election results section at putnamboe.com for verification that he was not. The article says nothing to that effect ([1]).

[I] fail to see how you are paying the greatest care and attention to neutrality. I don't know what you mean by this. WP:NEUTRALITY redirects to the Neutrality WikiProject, which has been superseded by the neutral POV noticeboard (a sub-page of the neutral POV policy). That policy says, "Articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides, fairly and without editorial bias. This applies to both what you say and how you say it." Are you accusing me of introducing bias into the article? — fourthords | =Λ= | 17:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the latest phase of our edit war you removed the 2001 General Election table that listed Thoubboron as the Democratic candidate. In previous edits you restored that incorrect table after I corrected it to show that Thoubboron had only the "SAFE" independent ballot line (and also reinstated the misspelling of his name). Your doing so indicated bias in favor of whoever had introduced those errors since asking me for sources while taking their erroneous conduct on faith is not equal treatment.LE (talk) 03:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donald_B._Smith&oldid=1213964069"