Talk:Don Showalter

This article was nominated for deletion on September 6, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Kentucky / Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance).

Teaching style

The section on teaching style needs work. I've tagged it as unreferenced, which it is, but I probably could justify a neutral point of view tag as well. I'm sure he's an engaging lecturer, but unsupported statements such as "cult figure," "considered by many viewers to be comical," or "especially amusing," aren't really encyclopedic. I know nothing of this person beyond what I read here, so I'm not really in a position to do anything to fix this section, short of just removing it. Eron 14:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, if you have seen World of Chemistry videos as many times as I have, you would know just how accurate those accounts are. EmericanBuddha 19:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately we can't trust you per WP:V WP:RS. In the future don't remove maintenance tags without addressing them.--Crossmr 20:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When did I ever do that. EmericanBuddha (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Right here [1].--Crossmr (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'll be damned, sorry for doubting you. EmericanBuddha (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]