Talk:Don Mills Road

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada Streets Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada's streets and arterial thoroughfares on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canada StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada StreetsTemplate:WikiProject Canada StreetsCanadian street articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

The problem with the citations on this article aren't any particularly controversial statements requiring verification with Template:fact. It's that there are too few references in general. I added some where I could (before that there were no references!), but I think it's clear that the article needs to cite more sources. I'd like to re-tag with Template:Refimprove, but I'll admit to not being 100% on WP guidelines for roads. - Intractable (talk) 22:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging is ugly. I'd rather you just add a {{fact}} tag wherever you think there should be a citation. --Pwnage8 (talk) 01:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Except for the news stories, I suppose there's nothing particularly contentious. My preference is for articles to be heavily sourced, but maybe that's hard to do in the context of a road. I've sourced or requested sources for things that feel like they need support, so I'm ok with leaving it without the tag. Cheers. -- Intractable (talk) 02:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]