Talk:Don Harlow

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Constructed languages: Esperanto Low‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Esperanto task force.

Removed cleanup template

I removed the cleanup template after the following exchange with A dmrb♉ltz:

I'm curious to know why you tagged the Don Harlow stub for cleanup. I didn't create the article and have no vested interest in it, I'm just curious. I've been here a bit too long to call myself a newbie, but the amount of time I'm able to spend editing Wikipedia articles is limited, so I often feel like I'm new even though I'm not. It seems like a perfectly good stub to me, and there were no comments on the talk page to enlighten me (in fact, there is no talk page at all). As I said, my dander's not up or anything, I'm just curious. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See the dif from when I added it -- it not realy encyclopedic, and had 2 images that were deleted shortly after I tagged it. A dmrb♉ltz (T | C)

Thanks. That clears things up for me nicely. The old version was indeed very much in need of cleanup. Does the cleanup template need to be removed, now? If so, I'll be happy to do it—or you can. Lemmeknow. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is safe to remove it, and you can go ahead and do it; I am at work :p A dmrb♉ltz (T | C) 22:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

—CKA3KA (Skazka) 23:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]