Talk:Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2010 film)

This page was proposed for deletion by Cnilep (talk · contribs) on 10 August 2009 with the comment:
Describes a film currently in production, expected to be distributed in 2011. Fails WP:CRYSTAL.
It was contested by ThaddeusB (talk · contribs) on 17 August 2009 with the comment:
contest prod - future films are very rarely notable, but this one seems likely to be as it has already been covered by many reliable sources & had a notable accident during filming - standardize referencing

Film: Australian / Mexican / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Mexican cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema / Rhode Island Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Low-importance).

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spoiler ridden article is not quite accurate

The article includes some inaccuracies and some questionable interpretation of what actually transpires in the film.

The 'goblinized' character of Kim at the end of the movie most certainly does not persuade the other 'goblins' to give Sally a pass and wait for others to come. It's made clear in the movie that "one must be taken" (i.e. if not Sally someone else, who turns out to be Kim). The scene at the end is one of a few that are pretty much a verbatim rehashing of the original, with the other goblins asking when they will be let out again; they're not saying "let's get Sally!" They took Kim instead.

As for Sally 'killing Lord Blackwood', this may be somewhat interpretative rather than a clear fact of the movie. There is nothing in the film that clearly suggests the goblin that Sally squishes was either "the head goblin" or the goblin version of Blackwood. The notion that 'the head goblin' is Blackwood is only suggested in the "making of" documentary accompanying the DVD where the film's creators describe their inspiration for the creature designs. One of them suggests "the head goblin" is the transformed Blackwood, reunited with his 'goblinized' son (a revelation which in my opinion, along with the fact that the goblins can be killed fairly easily, makes the movie considerably less frightening and less interesting). — Preceding unsigned comment added by CannotFindAName (talk • contribs) 04:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers

This isn't a very frequently visited page so I probably will not get the feedback I'm looking for here. Perhaps I'll post this elsewhere because it's a problem with Wikipedia movie articles in general, not just this one. Is it really appropriate for an article about a movie to give not merely a plot synopsis but to basically describe the whole movie, ending and all? I for one would never read a Wikipedia article about a movie I have not yet seen; they all contain movie ruining spoilers. I think this is a problem. Thoughts? CannotFindAName (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers should not be removed. See WP:SPOILER. Cresix (talk) 17:28, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HP Lovecraft

The film (and original) is very evidently inspired by the writings of HP Lovecraft, can this get a mention and source? Cerumol2 (talk) 19:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2010 or 2011?

This film premiered in November 2010 at the Virginia Film Festival, so why is it being called a 2011 film?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2010 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007004649/http://www.cineaste.com/articles/emdarkem-deeds-an-interview-with-guillermo-del-toro-and-guy-pearce to http://www.cineaste.com/articles/emdarkem-deeds-an-interview-with-guillermo-del-toro-and-guy-pearce

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]