Talk:Domnica Radulescu

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 October 2016 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romania Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Ian at Semaphore (talk · contribs) has been paid by Semaphore Computing Ltd represented by Ian at Semaphore on behalf of Domnica Radulescu.

Paid Contributor

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first.

Can the 'Conflict of Interest' flag now been removed from this article as I believe this issue has been address in the approved manner. Thank you.

An employee of Semaphore Computing Ltd, who are paid by the subject of this page, the author Domnica Radulescu, to design, edit, maintain and host her personal website, have also been requested by the subject to perform modifications and additions to the Wikipedia article about her. These modifications and additions are solely concerned with listing works which are in the public domain and excepts from the work and/or reviews of the works, also in the public domain. There is no specific conflict to interest to the benefit of either party in this, merely to ensure the article is complete and up to date in a timely manner. 86.215.38.254 (talk) 11:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed this for you. Assuming that you are Ian at Semaphore, you do have a conflict of interest of benefit to you and your client- you work for her, and it's in her interest for you to do that work. This is fine since you have disclosed. I would note it is not "her Wiki page", but a Wikipedia article about her. Please see the edit request process. 331dot (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, are you now able to remove the 'close connection' flag at the head of the Dominica Radulescu article as I believe that I have now satisfied the requirements to disclose my 'close connection' as previously requested ? Much appreciated. Ian at Semaphore (talk) 09:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't just about disclosing the connection, but about someone independent reviewing the article for neutrality and things like that. I'm not able to do so at present. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian at Semaphore Your request is a misunderstanding of how article maintenance templates work. The placement of COI editor self-disclosure templates on an article's talk page have no bearing on the main article page's maintenance templates. Those main article templates address the time period (however long or short it was) when undisclosed COI editing occurred. Disclosures on the talk page which are made after the fact do not address the time period when undisclosed editing may have occurred in the article itself. That's the job of the article maintenance template, to address that time period.^[a]

Notes

^ This is not to say that the article's maintenance template is meant to permanently mark the article for life. Editors generally prefer for that type of template to "linger" for a while, even after a disclosure is made, under the theory that if it happened once it may be likely to happen again under another undisclosed editor. Experience has shown this to be true in some articles, which would explain editor reticence to remove the template too quickly. However, as an alternative, you may try asking the editor who placed the template in this article if it can be removed more quickly. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether the conditions which warranted this particular placement have been corrected or not.

Regards, Spintendo 11:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Sources to 'Works' , sub-category : 'Fiction'

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

This topic covers details of sources to added to the Domnica Radulescu Wiki page to improve it. ISBN references should be sufficient to have the 'does not cite sources tag' to be removed.

Country of Red Azaleas : a scholarly article from Research Gate Washington Independent Review of Books The Book Report The Malta Independent Snowflakes in a Blizzard review

Train to Trieste : Publishers Weekly Edith LaGraziana review Kirkus Reviews The Book Report review

Dream in a Suitcase : ISBN 978-1649795397 'a fast-paced journey of survival, resilience, and the power of love. It is the first English language memoir of a female Romanian-American survivor of the worst communist dictatorship behind the Iron Curtain'. World Literature Today review Ian at Semaphore (talk) 13:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will get a faster response if you mark this section as a formal edit request(click for instructions), as then more people than those that follow this article will see it. 331dot (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A list of published works usually don't require sources, only ISBN's, which act as the confirmation that an item was published. In this case, all three of the published works mentioned in the request have ISBN's displayed along with their mentions in the list. (See MOS:WORKS.) Regards, Spintendo 20:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, perhaps you can assist in getting the 'This section does not cite any sources' flag removed, or otherwise add the sources for me, as I am now unable to edit this page directly due to my declared 'conflict of interest'. Thanks. Ian at Semaphore (talk) 08:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Sources to 'Works' , sub-category : 'Literary Criticism'

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Theater of War and Exile : ISBN 978-0786473120,

Women’s Comedic Art as Social Revolution ISBN 978-0786460724,

The Theater of Teaching and the Lessons of Theater ISBN 978-0230603240,

Vampirettes, Wretches, and Amazons. Western Representations of East European Women ISBN 978-0880335522,

Realms of Exile. Nomadism, Diasporas and Eastern European Voices ISBN 978-0739103333,

Sisters of Medea. The Tragic Heroine across Cultures ISBN 978-1931948487.

André Malraux: The "Farfelu" as Expression of the Feminine and the Erotic ISBN 978-0820422961, Ian at Semaphore (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now Please use either the {{cite book}} template (which includes the |ISBN= parameter) or the {{ISBN}} template with your request, taking care to ensure that the nowiki formatting request in not invoked. Please place that request below this reply post. Regards, Spintendo 20:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have (hopefully) now added the ISBNs correctly. Please add and remove flag in article. Ian at Semaphore (talk) 09:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 30-SEP-2023

Edit request partially implemented

Y ISBN's were added to the requested publications where the {{ISBN}} template was applied to the proposed text as requested.
Y The references needed section templates were removed from two of the publications section headings. The {{COI}} template at the head of the article was not removed.
N ISBN's were not added to those publications where the {{ISBN}} template was not applied to the proposed text as requested.
N ISBN's were not added to the following publications: The Theater of Teaching and Vampirettes because those publications have co-authors which were not given in the proposed text. All authors of a publication must be included in the list, including co-authors.

Additional changes made:

Publications which did not have ISBN's were deleted.
The Awards section was deleted because none of the awards listed therein were independently notable in Wikipedia. (See WP:BLPAWARDS.)

Regards, Spintendo 22:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This is not to say that the article's maintenance template is meant to permanently mark the article for life. Editors generally prefer for that type of template to "linger" for a while, even after a disclosure is made, under the theory that if it happened once it may be likely to happen again under another undisclosed editor. Experience has shown this to be true in some articles, which would explain editor reticence to remove the template too quickly. However, as an alternative, you may try asking the editor who placed the template in this article if it can be removed more quickly. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether the conditions which warranted this particular placement have been corrected or not.

[a]